:: VITS partnership
:: References

:: Online vs manual
:: Savings potential
:: Moving vs fixed heads
:: Double vs onesided
:: Moisture detection

:: Contact us
:: Scienta online

























QCS for Impregnated paper > Online vs manual


Online vs manual measurement

There is no question of the superiority of online measurement to laboratory sampling. If you have any doubts or even if you don't, please review the comparison below:

Online vs
Offline
measurement
Scienta Online QCS Offline/laboratory sampling
Samples processed per hour 10.000 - 40.000

An online system processes more samples in 5 minutes than a laboratory in a week.
5 - 20
Time taken to correct the process None. The process is corrected immediately and continually. min. 5-10 min. The process is corrected once to reflect the situation 5-10 min earlier. The process is only corrected again after the following sample is processed. Again with significant delay.
Ability to monitor cross profile uniformity Yes. The cross profile of the product is monitored continuously. No.
Automatic control of key parameters Easy to implement. Not possible.
Ability to detect systematic patterns of faults (resulting from problems in the production line) Yes. No.
Roller wear monitoring Yes. No.
Time needed to change paper grade Immediate detection of in-spec quality -> less waste, less time. Waste because of slow sample processing.
Measurement data collection Automatic. Manual.
Measurement data processing and analysis.
Ability to link automatically to process management systems (MIS).
All links exist. Easy to integrate and tailor to specific requirement and needs. Manual.
Ability to implement Quality Standards on the production line Very easy. All required data exists and can be processed automatically. Manual and cumbersome.
Savings created through process optimization and reduction of waste. Significant. Process is not optimized and therefore no benefits are materialized.


for more information on any particular point

:: Contact us!